Our Foundation
Built on the Authority
of Supreme Court Rulings.
We do not speculate. We operate on established legal precedents that secure your assets.
Legal Intelligence
The Retrocession Imperative: A 2025 Legal Analysis
An in-depth examination of the evolving regulatory landscape and its implications for institutional investors and family offices.
Retrocession
Recovery
Legal Framework 2025
LegaFund Intelligence
The Legal Framework
The Swiss Federal Supreme Court has consistently strengthened investor protection over the last two decades. These key rulings form the basis of our recovery mandates.
Leading Case
BGE 138 III 755
BGE 132 III 460
The landmark decision. The Federal Supreme Court ruled that retrocessions (kickbacks) belong to the client, not the bank, unless a valid waiver was signed.
BGE 138 III 755
Expansion of scope. The court clarified that this applies not only to external asset managers but also to internal bank products and group companies.
BGE 143 III 348
Clarification on limitation periods. The court confirmed a 10-year statute of limitations for reclaiming retrocessions, opening a significant window for recovery.
Recovered Assets
Confidential Settlement Ledger
| Case ID | Institution Type | Status | Recovered |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZH-2023-92 | Major Swiss Bank | Settled | CHF 1.2M |
| GE-2024-14 | Cantonal Bank | Paid Out | CHF 850k |
| TI-2023-05 | Private Bank | Settled | CHF 2.4M |
| ZH-2024-01 | Asset Manager | Audit Complete | CHF 450k |
Disclaimer: Case data is anonymized to protect client confidentiality and comply with settlement agreements. Past performance does not guarantee future results.