2025 law change: “debt enforcement leading to bankruptcy” — why earlier resolution matters

From 1 January 2025, debt enforcement for certain registered debtors can proceed as bankruptcy. We summarise the change at a high level and what it implies for early, fair collection practices.

January 24, 20262 min readBy Amadeus Romeo
InkassoBetreibungKonkursSchKGCompliance
Share
On this page

Focus and scope#

This note places a law change effective 1 January 2025 into a receivables-management / debt-enforcement context. It is intentionally high-level and does not replace legal advice. The operational point is simple: early clarification becomes even more important when cases can move faster into “hard” escalation stages. [ESTV 2025]

chart konkurs eroeffnungen total 1994 2024
chart konkurs eroeffnungen total 1994 2024

1) What changes from 1 January 2025 (high-level)#

The Swiss Federal Tax Administration (ESTV) summarises the change (for the collection of taxes and duties) as follows:

“Until 31 December 2024, the collection of taxes and duties is only possible via debt enforcement leading to seizure (Art. 43 no. 1 SchKG). This provision is repealed and from 1 January 2025, for every debtor registered in the commercial register, the initiated enforcement will proceed as bankruptcy (Art. 39 SchKG).” [ESTV 2025]

Important: this is an official summary with references to SchKG provisions. The precise legal scope depends on context and applicability. [SchKG; ESTV 2025]

2) Why this matters operationally#

Operationally, the key question is: how quickly can a payment delay turn into a formal procedure with potentially severe consequences?

This affects:

  • Debtor segmentation: commercial-register debtors vs. non-registered debtors (simplified).

  • Timing: if the “bankruptcy” path is closer, early settlements (payment plans, security, clean handling of objections) matter more.

  • Documentation: if enforcement is needed later, you require clean evidence (service delivered, invoice, reminders, communications, agreements).

3) Early resolution is not “soft” — it is risk-reducing#

Many businesses wait too long because debt collection feels uncomfortable. In an environment where procedural volumes and risks are rising, that is counterproductive:

  • Early clarification reduces unnecessary proceedings and follow-on costs.

  • Early clarification protects relationships where continued cooperation is sensible.

  • Early clarification can protect the debtor too: a documented payment plan is often better than escalation.

Takeaway#

The 1 January 2025 change is another reason to treat debt collection as early clarification and structure work: respectful, documented, solution-oriented — and with a clear escalation logic if no agreement is possible. [ESTV 2025; SchKG]

References#

Regulatory notice#

This publication is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice. It is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation. It is directed solely at qualified investors in Switzerland and is not intended for U.S. persons.

Insights updates.

Receive selected analysis on Swiss litigation finance and regulatory developments.

Processed in accordance with our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.

In this series

Debt Collection In Switzerland

Part 4 of 6
  1. 1
    Debt collection (Inkasso) in Switzerland: why it matters — and why it is not a taboo
  2. 2
    Debt collection, debt enforcement and bankruptcy: the Swiss process in one overview
  3. 3
    What the numbers show: payment orders and bankruptcies in Switzerland (1994/1995–2024)
  4. 4
    2025 law change: “debt enforcement leading to bankruptcy” — why earlier resolution matters
  5. 5
    A practical playbook: early intervention, payment plans and de-escalation
  6. 6
    Compliance in debt collection: privacy, communication and auditability

Related insights

Further reading you may find relevant.

Regulatory notice

This material is for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or solicitation. It is directed exclusively at qualified investors and is not intended for US persons.